Neura.net: Perspectives on CNS Disease Management
Member Login  |  Site Map  |  Disclaimer  |  Contact  |  Bookmark
Advanced Search
Text Size
 |  Monday, September 06, 2010 
Home
 
 
Home > Congress Coverage > WCTRIMS 2008 > Examining Emerging Therapies & Approaches
Examining Emerging Therapies & Approaches
 
Several reports at the 2008 WCTRIMS meeting offered new data from clinical trials of both investigational and established therapies for MS.

Rituximab in PPMS

Kathleen S. Hawker, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, and colleagues reported on the efficacy and safety of rituximab in PPMS. The study involved 439 patients who were randomized to receive 2 intravenous infusions of rituximab or placebo (each dose separated by 2 weeks) every 24 weeks over a period of 96 weeks (4 treatment courses). The difference in time to confirmed disease progression between the treatment groups was not statistically significant, but the median change in T2 lesion volume from baseline to week 96 was significantly lower with rituximab than with placebo (P=0.0008). No significant differences in brain volume were apparent between treatment groups.

Alemtuzumab

Alemtuzumab showed a significant difference from SC IFN with respect to achieving a clinically disease-free state in a trial of patients with RRMS. Krzysztof Selmaj, Klinika j Katedra Neurologii Akademii, Lodz, Poland, on behalf of the CAMMS223 Study Group, explained that these findings came from a randomized trial of 334 patients who received SC IFN 44 3 times weekly or alemtuzumab infusions of 24 or 12 mg/day for 5 days at Month 0, 3 days at Month 12, and, in some patients, for 3 days at Month 24. Followup data showed that the proportion of patients free from relapse, free from 3- month accumulation of disability, and free from 6-month accumulation of disability was significantly greater with alemtuzumab than with SC IFN at years 1 through 3 (P<0.0001). In addition, the proportion of patients free from clinical disease was significantly higher with alemtuzumab than with IFN at years 1 (86% vs 63%, respectively), 2 (81% vs 48%, respectively), and 3 (71% vs 38%, respectively); P<0.0001 for all comparisons.

Alternate-Day Dosing Strategy

A pilot study presented by Omar Khan and colleagues, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, suggested that glatiramer acetate 20 mg SC may be equally effective whether administered once daily or every other day in patients with RRMS. Among 30 patients randomized to the 2 dosage schedules, no differences in relapse rates, disease progression, change in T2-weighted lesion volume, or Gd-enhanced lesions were found at 2 years. Moreover, in vitro proliferation of glatiramer acetate-responsive T cells and Th1/Th2 cytokine expression did not differ between groups at any point. After 2 years, all patients in the once-daily treatment group switched to every-other-day treatment. At 4 years, no differences in the endpoints were found between the crossover group and the patients who had continuously received glatiramer acetate on an every-other-day basis. The researchers suggest that larger, multicenter trials are warranted to confirm these findings and to identify an optimal dosage for glatiramer acetate in RRMS.

Induction Therapy

Short-term induction therapy with mitoxantrone prior to treatment with glatiramer acetate resulted in substantial suppression of clinical disease activity in patients with active RRMS, according to a study by Jason Ramtahal and Mike Boggild, Walton Centre for Neurology and Neuro surgery, NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom. The study enrolled 77 patients, all of whom received mito xantrone induction therapy: 58 received 48 mg/m2 over 8 months and the others (earlier-treated patients) received somewhat higher total dosages. This mitoxantrone induction overlapped with glatiramer acetate therapy for the final 3 months, after which all patients received glatiramer acetate alone. The annualized relapse rate was reduced from 1.85 pre-induction to 0.16 or less at a mean follow-up of 44 months and was sustained up to 6 years.

Vaccination Approach

Heather B. Streeter and colleagues, University of Bristol, United Kingdom, described data showing that ATXMS1467, a peptide vaccine for MS, was safe and well tolerated in a study of 6 patients with SPMS. After receiving escalating doses of ATX-MS1467 (25 to 800 mg), these patients exhibited no treatment-related or serious adverse events. In 4 patients who had a significant T-cell response to myelin basic protein before the trial, this response was significantly suppressed at 1 month after the administration of ATX-MS1467 (P=0.0313).

1  2  


   
Neura.net is administered, managed, and populated by Expert Medical Education, a company dedicated to the education of healthcare professionals. The individual educational materials available here are supported by educational grants from Teva Neuroscience. This site is intended for U.S. audiences only. This Web site is for use by healthcare professionals only. It is not meant to serve as a substitute for a consultation with your physician. If you are a patient and would like to see Neura.net's educational material for patients, click here. Some discussions of drugs and devices contained on this Web site may include mention of uses that have not been evaluated by the United States Food and Drug Administration for safety and efficacy. Please consult complete prescribing information for any of the drugs and devices discussed before using them.
© 2010 Neura.net. All rights reserved.